Historical Tornado Data

CSS-50 The alarmist narrative hangs on (rather precariously I would suggest) to three pillars of pseudoscience, CO₂ is a greenhouse gas, Computer Models and Extreme Weather Events. I class them as pseudoscience, because the alarmist narrative focuses in on the simplistic, unscientific (and ultimately dangerous) concept that CO₂ is the primary driver for climate change on this planet. The claim is made despite there being no empirical CO₂/Temperature datasets that show CO₂ driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. The computer models are self acknowledged as running too hot and use high emission scenarios that are implausible. And finally, Extreme Weather Events are not getting worse. This post focuses on tornado frequency.

#climatechange #delaythegreen #globalwarming #showusthedata

A violent tornado is almost instantly put forward as a sign of the impending Climate Apocalypse. Key the attribution studies that attribute a portion of the tornado outbreaks to “Climate Change (i.e.: human CO₂ emissions). Attribution studies that rely on the same computer models (algorithms, input biases, etc.) that run way too hot. Models that must be neglecting reality. The stronger tornados (F2 to F5) have all been declining since 1950. A period that accounts for 86%+ of our CO₂ emissions. That certainly does not fit the narrative. Rising CO₂ levels are definitely not leading to more or more powerful tornado activity. One more example (in my opinion) of the misinformation/lies propagated by the alarmist community, led by our political “leadership” and their media minions.

For more perspective and more detailed analysis, you can check out some of the following posts.

Tornado Archive

Welcome to Tornado Archive!

There is NO Climate Emergency

Clintel Climate Intelligence

One Page Summary (OPS)

OPS-55 – The State of Climate Science

The State of Climate Science

Climate Short Story (CSS)

CSS-30 – CMIP6 Climate Models

CMIP6 Climate Models