What Is Chat-GPT’s Thoughts on My Writing?
CSS-76 Earlier this month, I received an email from someone that had asked Chat-GPT to evaluate the climate related writings on my personal website https://climatechangeandmusic.com. That unedited evaluation (in pdf form) can be accessed here.
Original Analysis
The following request was included in the email.
“I wonder if you would care to address the few critiques in the CHAT-GPT answer.”
My address to those critiques and some additional comments to address missing context or potential corrections can be found in the pdf accessible here.
Analysis (with comments)
#climatechange #delaythegreen #globalwarming #showusthedata
Overall, Chat-GPT’s analysis was fair and reasonable. I have always recognized my limitations. But I do enjoy research that works to minimize those limitations. My opinions are formed based on the empirical data and always will be. A whole lot of data is routinely marginalized or pushed aside when the data does not adhere to the preferred narrative. That is not consistent with the Scientific Method. If the theory does not match the data, the theory is wrong (or needs adjustment). In ‘climate science’, it appears that the data is routinely adjusted (i.e.: homogenized) to fit the narrative.
I found the analysis interesting and thank the email author for taking the time to initiate that evaluation. I have not dived into the AI pool yet but that will happen in the future. Just before Christmas I did a search on my name and was surprised with a brief, positive Bing AI assessment (for what it is worth).
I am also thankful that the author did not request that Chat-GPT review the music section of the website. They would have found all kinds of issues with the guitarist and vocalist, since I am the only guy, I can afford. Luckily, I have a thick skin.
The links referenced within the pdfs are included below.
CSS-71 – IPCC’s Model/Theory Shortcomings
CSS-71 – IPCC’s Model/Theory Shortcomings – Revisited
CSS-75 – Solar Forcing Discussion
OPPS-6 – Confessions of an Anthropogenic Global Warmist
OPPS-33 – What Happens After Net Zero?
IPCC’s TAR report: Climate System Description (Chapter 14, page 771).
Net Zero Averted Temperature Increase – R. Lindzen, W. Happer, W. A. van Wijngaarden
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07392
Zama Acid Gas Disposal/Miscible Flood Implementation and Results – R. Davison et al
Randall Bock – How to Fix Science – Tom Nelson Podcast #362
IPCC – Extreme Weather Events – Table 12.12
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-12
The Scientific Method – Merriam-Webster’s definition
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%20method
New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model – Nikilov, Zeller 2017
NASA/GISS – Surface Station Datahttps://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data_v4_globe/
You could certainly see your skills in the work you write. The world hopes for even more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.