With respect to “Climate Change”, this website and my contribution to the discussion focuses on the data. I have a standing request/challenge to anyone (scientist or not) to provide an empirical Temperature/CO2 data set that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. Scientific proof requires empirical data. The Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) theory does not have that empirical data (because that data does not exist).

OPPS

COVID-19 and Climate Change – Censoring the Experts

OPPS-19 I would not normally follow up one post with another one this quickly, but I am thoroughly disgusted with what is happening with society right now and fearful of what will become of our society in the very near future. There is a globalist One World Government push led by the UN and their totalitarian Agendas (21 and 2030). You can argue that it is already here since our supposedly independent leaders have already shown themselves to be puppets/cheerleaders for the UN.

In Canada, despite the severe financial problems thrust upon us by the COVID-19 fiasco, our idiotological leader continues to push his unscientific, uneconomic, destructive green policy in line with the UN Agendas. There is no empirical CO2/Temperature dataset that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. You could shut down every climate skeptic/realist on the planet by bringing that one basic scientific method requirement forward. That has not happened yet and will not ever happen, because that empirical data does not exist. When you review “ALL” the data, you will find that the sun (through direct and indirect means) is the primary climate driver. CO2 is a bit player at best.

#climatechange #delaythegreen #globalwarming #showusthedata

The UN’s IPCC and the Catastrophic Global Warming” (CAGW) alarmist crowd uses the unscientific method of focusing on one (very minor) parameter (CO2) over a very brief time period (the Modern Temperature Record (MTR, 1850 to the Present) and then adjusting the measured data (homogenization) to fit their narrative. I am not going to go through the “Climate Change” Science in this post. That is all covered on my website (climatechangeandmusic.com) or you can research the links I have included with this post. I simply put forward the data, give my opinion on that data and ask the reader to form their own conclusions. This post is about the response that very qualified doctors and scientists (in just about any discipline) get from the establishment (politicians, mainstream media, tech platforms, etc.) when they speak out against the official “Narrative”. All the individual doctors and scientists shown here have very valid concerns and differences of opinion with those “narratives”. But rather than engaging these very real experts, they are simply ignored, censored, attacked, etc. Scientific progress is built on skepticism not conformance. Our current political leaders are not following the science, they are following their ideologies. And that is leading us down a path that we are all going to regret deeply.

Great Barrington Declaration
Rome Declaration
CLINTEL – World Climate Declaration – There is no Climate Emergency
Oregon Petition
Affidavit – LtC Theresa Long, MD
American Greatness – Heroes of the Pandemic
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
Climate Depot
Climate Discussion Nexus
CO2 Coalition
Friends of Science Society
Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
Home | Heartland Institute
Real Climate Science – Tony Heller
Whats Up With That (WUWT)