Vaccine Passport Logic

This post is definitely political. Any opinions are mine and are just that, opinions. I have concerns with the vaccinations, but I respect everyone’s right to choose the vaccine. I pray that the worst vaccine consequences do not become reality, but we will not know the breadth of those long-term consequences (Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), cancers, fertility issues, etc.) for a while yet (maybe years). If this post gets censored, the post can be accessed directly on my website (climatechangeandmusic.com).

The medical totalitarianism being pushed on the world’s citizen is becoming ridiculous. Vaccine Passports will do little to stop the spread of COVID-19. Fully vaccinated people are still capable of both contracting and spreading the virus. And fully vaccinated people are still being hospitalized and dying. The vaccination does reduce the symptoms and risks of dying but that makes it a therapeutic not a vaccine.

#climatechange #delaythegreen #globalwarming #showusthedata

Forcing people to take an untested experimental “vaccine”, but at the same time ignoring natural immunities and suppressing the use of potential therapeutics (like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin) is criminal. Canadian vaccinations (double jabs) have passed 80%. When is enough, enough? We are following the same path as Israel where vaccine passports were revoked for any citizens that have not received their “booster” shot. There is no end to that policy. An ineffective policy that does not even stop the virus.

There are significant severe complications to taking the “vaccine” (including death). The VAERS reporting system lists over 7,000 deaths and half a million adverse reactions in the United States. The CMS Medicare Tracking System has reported over 48,000 deaths within 14 days of receiving either the first or second jab. At what point do we take a step back and re-evaluate what we are doing? During the Swine Flu outbreak in the 1970’s, they stopped vaccinations after 25 people had died and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) cases reached around 500. What happened to those safety protocols?

These are not just new traditional vaccines, they are new mRNA technology (gene therapy) that have exactly “ZERO” long term tests. All those who have been vaccinated are now participating in those long-term tests. Not to be flippant, but a good long-term test requires a placebo population and I would prefer to be part of the placebo group for a variety of reasons.

1. There are many prominent doctors/research scientists around the world that are speaking out against the COVID-19 vaccine protocols/passports, therapeutic censorship, lockdowns, masks, etc. Not the least of which is Dr. Robert Malone (the inventor of the mRNA technology that the COVID-19 vaccines use). Dr. Malone is spearheading the Rome Declaration that lays out a safer, more realistic approach to the COVID-19 situation. The focus is on early treatment with therapeutics, recognition of natural immunity and a focussed approach to vaccine use. An introduction to some of the other prominent doctors and research scientists questioning the current COVID-19 medical narrative can be explored in the following article (Heroes of the Pandemic). Do your own research.
2. I have blood clotting issues and do not need to add on the blood clotting issues that are induced by these “vaccines”.
3. My wife has had personal experience with traditional flu vaccine side effects. She developed GBS in January 2019 (after receiving the flu vaccine). She was almost completely paralyzed, spent several weeks on life support, followed by several months in hospital learning to talk and walk again. She still has long term complications, but she had resumed a normal life. That obviously changed with the onset of this COVID-19 induced medical totalitarianism. There is nothing normal about being forced to take an experimental gene therapy by taking away the ability of a grandmother to fly out and visit her grandchild.
4. I am an engineer by training and I am very qualified to analyze data. I have looked at detailed data and have found that the data has been purposefully obscured to make definitive evaluations very difficult. You can get the number of people that have died with COVID-19, but you cannot easily backout the number of people that have died of COVID-19. That is an important distinction. According to the CDC only 5 or 6% of the deaths can be attributed to just COVID-19. The rest of the deaths had 3 to 4 other serious comorbidities. COVID-19 may have been the prime morbidity in some of the cases but not all of them. Then you look at the testing parameters. The PCR test (the standard for COVID-19 confirmation) has serious reliability issues when the number of cycles goes over 25 to 30. Throughout the Pandemic, laboratories routinely used 35 to 40 cycles. So, how many of those reported COVID-19 deaths even had COVID-19? The CDC also recently announced that they will be implementing a new test in December 2021 that differentiates between the cold, flu and corona viruses. Implying that the current testing does not? So, you tell me how many people have died of COVID-19?
5. As mentioned previously, there is data that shows there are serious side effects to the “vaccines”. Why are these not properly laid out to the public? Why has the flu virtually disappeared? Why are we experiencing a spike through the summer? There is data that shows there are safe medical treatments that can be used to treat (and even prevent) COVID-19. Why are these options being censored and ignored rather than being used and/or researched further? If you can authorize a completely experimental mRNA gene theory for emergency use, you can authorize therapeutics (like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin which have been used with minimal medical complications for decades) for emergency use. In reality, you do not need to invoke emergency use. You just need to allow the doctors to use them in an off-label capacity.

I do not pretend to be an expert on medical issues. But there are a lot of a lot of very qualified medical professionals that have raised serious questions about our response to COVID-19. These people are being minimized, censored and attacked despite their qualifications to speak on the subject. Why is the whole narrative put out by Anthony Fauci the only path forward? Especially since Fauci is very likely one of the major players that are responsible for the pandemic to begin with and is therefore subject to a direct conflict of interest.

Do these tactics surprise me? No, the same techniques have been used to keep the “Global Warming” narrative going for decades. As with COVID-19, very qualified climate scientists have also been minimized, censored and attacked (just for a much longer time period). Both “Climate Change” and COVID-19 alarmists have used computer models to spread fear with unsubstantiated, inflated projections. Both CC and CV-19 alarmists cherry pick their data to bolster their narrative rather than letting the real science develop (based on all the data). Both CC and CV-19 are subject to the same simplistic, unscientific approach of focusing on one variable to fix the perceived problem (CO₂ and vaccines, respectively). Both CC and CV-19 narratives are pushed by the same people (politicians, media, etc.) for the same reason (a push towards the New World Order (NWO, an unelected, unaccountable, arguably corrupt, totalitarian world government as laid out in the UN Agendas (21 and 2030))). “Global Warming” or Climate Change or Climate Disruption or Climate Emergency or Climate “Next Scary Descriptor” are just the slow, long, unnoticed, underground “UN Agenda/Communist” burn and COVID-19 (the WEF’s Great Reset) is the accelerant that is now propelling the totalitarian flames that are threatening to engulf society. As we move further down these UN/WEF agendas, all we will experience is a “Great Regret”.

Climate Change has been declared “Settled Science”. Which is outright laughable. Despite decades of research, the CAGW alarmist “consensus” has never put forward an empirical CO2/Temperature dataset that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale (a basic requirement of the Scientific Method). The data shows that the sun is the primary climate driver but that does not fit the CAGW narrative. COVID-19 science is still in its infancy but the science has already been corrupted by pushing coordinated narratives rather than allowing the entire scientific community to evaluate the problems and develop the correct solutions and policies to get there.

So, NO I am not in favor of Vaccine Passports and I would like to see some common sense put back into scientific discussions (including but not limited to “Climate Change” and COVID-19). Allow the use of proven safe therapeutics (like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin) and fight this virus with all our available weapons. When China moves on Taiwan should we rely on knife fights to help them or bring out the full armoury?