With respect to “Climate Change”, this website and my contribution to the discussion focuses on the data. I have a standing request/challenge to anyone (scientist or not) to provide an empirical Temperature/CO2 data set that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. Scientific proof requires empirical data. The Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) theory does not have that empirical data (because that data does not exist).

FEATUREDLatestOPPS

Liberal – Net Zero – Cost Benefit

OPPS-32 Net Zero is a total sham. Using the Liberal’s own numbers shows that we (Canadian taxpayers) will be spending more money than we save on climate change damage. The best case (assuming you believe everything Mark Carney says), Net Zero only costs us $0.7 trillion but has an unmeasurable impact on temperature rise (slowing the rise by just 0.018 °C, roughly $1 trillion for every 1/100th of a degree Celsius of temperature rise averted). The reality is mush higher.

#climatechange #delaythegreen #globalwarming #showusthedata

Additional discussion can be found in the following links.

In What Reality Does Net Zero Make Sense?

Energy & Climate at a Glance – Canadian Edition 2024

https://friendsofscience.org/library/published-books/energy-and-climate-at-a-glance-canadian-edition-2024.html

Net Zero Averted Temperature Increase – Lindzen, Happer, van Wijngaarden (June 2024)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07392

Political Short Story (PSS)

PSS-6 – Net Zero – Quick Cost Benefit Analysis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *