OPS

OPS-19 The whole “Global Warming” Alarmist story is based strictly on computer model projections. That is not science. Computer modelling

OPS-18 In reviewing “Climate Change” over these many years, there is one outstanding “BASIC” principle of science that is completely

OPS-17 I (being an engineer) have focused on the science first. But the economic analysis (which you won’t get from

OPS-16 The following OPS summary appears dramatic at first glance. However, the atmospheric CO2 concentration extrapolations shown here (based solely

OPS-15 Just a quick summary to show the Northern Hemisphere snow trends and add to the discussion in OPS-13. Despite

OPS-14 Consensus is unfortunately a very dangerous word in the field of science. As Einstein has famously said (paraphrased), it

OPS-13a A discussion I had recently steered me back to the IPCC website. After reviewing some of the reports (link

OPS-12 The deepest problem that the “Global Warming” alarmist crowd has with defending their position is the lack of empirical

OPS-11 This is a focused version of OPS-10. The smaller scale is included to get a better picture of FOS

OPS-10 I apologize for taking some time off between posts. I’ve been busy with family life (children’s weddings, grandchildren birthday