Paris Accord 2015
OPS-17 I (being an engineer) have focused on the science first. But the economic analysis (which you won’t get from
Read MoreWith respect to “Climate Change”, this website and my contribution to the discussion focuses on the data. I have a standing request/challenge to anyone (scientist or not) to provide an empirical Temperature/CO2 data set that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. Scientific proof requires empirical data. The Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) theory does not have that empirical data (because that data does not exist).
OPS-17 I (being an engineer) have focused on the science first. But the economic analysis (which you won’t get from
Read MoreOPS-16 The following OPS summary appears dramatic at first glance. However, the atmospheric CO2 concentration extrapolations shown here (based solely
Read MoreOPS-15 Just a quick summary to show the Northern Hemisphere snow trends and add to the discussion in OPS-13. Despite
Read MoreOPS-13a A discussion I had recently steered me back to the IPCC website. After reviewing some of the reports (link
Read MoreOPS-12 The deepest problem that the “Global Warming” alarmist crowd has with defending their position is the lack of empirical
Read MoreOPS-11 This is a focused version of OPS-10. The smaller scale is included to get a better picture of FOS
Read MoreOPS-10 I apologize for taking some time off between posts. I’ve been busy with family life (children’s weddings, grandchildren birthday
Read MoreOPS-9 A common response by the “Global Warming” crowd is that 97% of scientists have endorsed the consensus that the
Read MoreOPS-8 The attached simple model (but by no means a definitive model) shows how easy it is to model modern
Read More