Solar Cycles – Coming GSM
OPS-21 This is a very important post. The “Global Warming” alarmist crowd has deliberately downplayed the radiative forcings associated with
Read MoreWith respect to “Climate Change”, this website and my contribution to the discussion focuses on the data. I have a standing request/challenge to anyone (scientist or not) to provide an empirical Temperature/CO2 data set that shows CO2 driving the climate on any statistically significant historical time scale. Scientific proof requires empirical data. The Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) theory does not have that empirical data (because that data does not exist).
OPS-21 This is a very important post. The “Global Warming” alarmist crowd has deliberately downplayed the radiative forcings associated with
Read MoreOPS-20 A continuation of the discussion laid out in OPS-19. Bottomline, there is no atmospheric CO2/Global Temperature data set that
Read MoreOPS-19 The whole “Global Warming” Alarmist story is based strictly on computer model projections. That is not science. Computer modelling
Read MoreOPS-18 In reviewing “Climate Change” over these many years, there is one outstanding “BASIC” principle of science that is completely
Read MoreOPS-17 I (being an engineer) have focused on the science first. But the economic analysis (which you won’t get from
Read MoreOPS-16 The following OPS summary appears dramatic at first glance. However, the atmospheric CO2 concentration extrapolations shown here (based solely
Read MoreOPS-15 Just a quick summary to show the Northern Hemisphere snow trends and add to the discussion in OPS-13. Despite
Read MoreOPS-13a A discussion I had recently steered me back to the IPCC website. After reviewing some of the reports (link
Read MoreOPS-12 The deepest problem that the “Global Warming” alarmist crowd has with defending their position is the lack of empirical
Read More